Forum: The ICRC Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law

The latest issue of the New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (Vol. 42, no. 3, Spring 2010) is out. It presents a forum on the ICRC Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law. Contents include:

  1. Ryan Goodman & Derek Jinks, The ICRC Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction to the Forum.
  2. Kenneth Watkin, Opportunity Lost: Organized Armed Groups and the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities” Interpretive Guidance.
  3. Michael N. Schmitt, Deconstructing Direct Participation in Hostilities: The Constitutive Elements.
  4. Bill Boothby, “And for Such Time As”: The Time Dimension to Direct Participation in Hostilities.
  5. W. Hays Parks, Part IX of the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities” Study: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect.
  6. Nils Melzer, Keeping the Balance between Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC’s Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: