HRW criticizes stop and search

Human Rights Watch has released a comprehensive report into the Government’s controversial anti-terrorism stop and search powers.

The report – Without Suspicion Stop and Search under the Terrorism Act 2000 –  criticizes area-based stop and search under section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000. Responding to proposals to cut the scope of the scheme, the reports states:

… we believe that even if the law were improved—if its geographic scope were permanently narrowed or its use restricted to specialist officers—the reforms would not entirely address the risk of arbitrary use, including profiling of ethnic minorities or stops of children. It is impossible to give clear guidance to officers on the use of a power that requires no reasonable suspicion. The risk of arbitrary use also makes the power incompatible with the traditional discretion given to UK police officers in course of their duties. The use of section 44 compromises the UK’s human rights obligations and is counterproductive.

The Home Office has been under significant pressure recently to repeal the powers. The European Court of Human Rights recently held that the powers violate the right to respect for private life guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention on Human Rights, and have refused the UK’s application to appeal.

The Home Secretary has already announced an “urgent review” of the powers after a recent admission that thousands of individual searches had been conducted illegally.

(h/t UK Human Rights Watch)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: