New EU police investigation co-operation alarms civil liberties watchdogs

EU observer reports that on Tuesday, UK home secretary Teresa May told British MPs that the government was to opt in to the ‘European Investigation Order’, a proposal from eight EU member states led by Belgium.

Currently, European police may make requests for help in  investigations via European ‘Mutual Legal Assistance’. The EIO, a  directive initiated by Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, Spain, Luxembourg,  Austria, Slovenia and Sweden, would replace and significantly streamline this system.

However, civil liberties groups worry that in the wording of the  proposal, the main grounds that have in the past been available for  authorities to refuse a request for mutual assistance will no longer be  available.

In particular, Statewatch, the UK-based civil liberties monitor, says there is no longer a basis for refusal on the grounds of territoriality and what is called “dual criminality” – that the act for which information is sought must constitute a crime punishable in both states.

This would now mean that a person who committed an act which is legal in the member state where the act was carried out could, according to  critics, be subject to body, house and business searches, financial  investigations, and some forms of covert surveillance, if the act is  regarded as a crime under the law of another member state.

For example, Holocaust denial is illegal in Germany and 12 other EU countries but not in the UK, Sweden or Spain – each of which back the new proposals. The EIO could thus in theory used by Germany to someone  who denied the Holocaust in a country where to do so is legal.

Statewatch also argues that the flexibility of the executing member state not to carry out coercive measures would also be dropped in the new legislation.
Separately, Fair Trials International, a human rights charity that campaigns for the rights of people facing criminal charges in a country other than their own, warns that the move will “allow European countriesto order … police to gather and share sensitive personal information,including recordings of bugged conversations, banking records and DNA,”and that police will be “powerless to refuse an order.”
Jago Russell, head of the campaign group, said:

“Police time could be wasted dealing with unreasonable demands for evidence and the cost to  our privacy could be enormous.”

“The proposals are also completely one-sided. If you are under  suspicion you will have no right to demand information from overseas  police to prove your innocence.”

FTI also fears that there is a lack of protection for individuals in custody who are transferred to other states for questioning.

The group says that easing police co-operation across the EU makes sense, but only in the context of additional safeguards to protect the fundamental rights of those being investigated, including common basic
standards on evidence-gathering across the EU.

Ms May however, denies that the legislation is a threat to civil liberties and said that human rights groups are mistaken.

“The UK would be able to refuse a search request where the crime isn’t recognised as a crime here,” she insisted in a statement.

“The European Investigation Order will prove to be an invaluable tool in the fight against transnational, international and serious organised crime,” she added. “We believe – as do prosecutors and the police – that the European Investigation Order will greatly benefit the UK  criminal justice system, without compromising civil liberties.”

The European Commission for its part is analysing the proposal for a  directive by the member states. It expects to offer its opinion on the matter within the next two months. “We’re keeping an open mind about it, but we must ensure that it contains the fundamental rights safeguards  that people need.”

“Broadly, it is going in the right direction,” fundamental rights spokesman Matthew Newman told EUobserver. “

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. European Investigation Orders (EIOs): Follow-up document of the meeting
    on 12-13 July 2010 (14 pages, pdf). See also: Fair Trials International:
    Submission on a European Investigation Order (pdf). See also: Discussion
    paper on the European Investigation Order (pdf) and Initiative for a Directive
    of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding the European Investigation
    Order in criminal matters – Detailed Statement (42 pages, pdf). See: Initiative
    for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding
    the European Investigation Order in criminal matters (pdf) See also: Statewatch
    Analysis: The proposed European Investigation Order: Assault on human rights
    and national sovereignty (pdf) by Steve Peers, Professor of Law, University
    of Essex.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: